The Future of Iraq is in NATO

[Φ Megalommatis]

The Future of Iraq is in NATO

 

Progress and Development in the Middle East hinge on an ultimate annihilation of the Colonial infrastructure set up by France and England

 

By Prof. Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis

 

 

As we all know in a few days the American presence will recede in Iraq, leaving space for the new Iraqi administration to show up. What are the challenges this group of new people will face? How could one help the first non Colonial government of Iraq set up a new infrastructure in all sorts of fields, going from Security and Interior to Education, and from Development to Foreign Policy?

 

France attempts to block the progress of Iraq

 

This question should be the only thought and care of the important powers and factors involved in the recent developments in the Old Land of Mesopotamia that led to the dethroning the uncultured, uncivilized, barbaric regime of a nauseating dictator, who would still enjoy power, if we were to pay more attention to the ludicrous idiocies Jacques Chirac unashamedly was diffusing to the four corners of the Universe!

 

However, the French President is still idiotically around and, in his appropriate style of Don Quichotte, friendly predisposed to all the remaining ruthless dictators of the world, will attempt another pathetic lecture about the ‘need’ for Iraq to be outside the NATO’s domain of influence and area of activity.

 

Why all this anti-democratic hysteria of Jacques Chirac, who recently said that Iraq needs not ‘Missionaries of Democracy’?

 

There is no point of counter-attacking and asking the mentally unbalanced and old President of an ailing country ‘whom then does Iraq need, Saddam Hussein?’. Pathetically, Chirac would not answer…

 

It is not a big deal; we can use History and Political Sciences to easily grasp what stands against the Neo-Nazist attitude of the French president. In reality, France is afraid that this is the end of an entire situation going back to Napoleon and the French Imperial dreams he elaborated and diffused among his compatriots, who are still of fond of the Corsican officer.

 

The paranoiac arguments of the French pro-dictatorial diplomacy

 

However, it would be interesting, before exploring the reasons of this unprecedented attitude, to examine the validity of arguments advanced by the French diplomacy in its support of the French Don Chiracotte!

 

French diplomats say that NATO is viewed in the Middle East as ‘an alliance of armies of the Christian West’. This is unbelievable! So blind and mentally impotent are the French? Staying first close to the facts, one should remind them that Turkey has been a fully accredited NATO member state for more than 50 years, and was always committed to both, the political and the military activities of the alliance. Not like France and ‘General’ de Gaulle’s ‘grandiose’ but lonely moving out of the military part of the Pact!

 

Turkey is NATO member and Muslim

 

How NATO is ‘an alliance of armies of the Christian West’, since Turkey is one of the top NATO armies, being a 99.5% Muslim country? Perhaps, Chirac will try to say that Islamic extremists do not consider the modern secular state of Turkey as ‘fully Islamic’!

 

Well, thank God that Turkey displeases the barbaric beggars of Egypt, the criminals of Sudan, the thieves of Syria (get out of Lebanon now, guys!), and the uncivilized, Terrorism funding, bogus princes and tent-‘kings’ of Saudi Arabia! Being rejected by the analphabetic masses of these dysfunctional states, Turkey gains a greater credit and an increased reputation among the civilized peoples of our world.

 

But what happened to Voltaire, Rousseau, Montesquieu, and all the French philosophers of the Lumieres? How great a pleasure they must feel watching such a disgusting pro-dictatorial degradation of their country’s foreign policy in which the arguments of barbaric and fanaticized masses, as well as of the world’s most anti-human terrorists, are being adopted by the successors of Talleyrand…

 

Chirac’s mouth pronounces the discourse of Ossama bin Laden

 

And Andre Malraux, the famous idealist, philosopher and Human Rights fighter, who risked his life in Spain against Franco in the middle 30s, would he accept this squalor of Jacques Chirac? What Jean Paul Sartre would say for this unmatched disgrace of his country?

 

Would there be one, just one, French politician after WWII, from Mendes France to the communist Marchais, and from Michel Debre to Francois Mitterrand, who would accept their country at a level that can only match that of the pro-Nazist inclinations of Petain in occupied WWII France?

 

When did a French politician and statesman make his the words of barbaric and criminal terrorists?

 

Muslims consist in a sizeable part of the Western countries

 

Speaking further on about this issue, one has to notice that, beyond Turkey’s participation in the NATO, there is a great number of Muslims in all the other NATO countries, starting from Germany (even Turkish origin members of the Parliament) and France (where the majority of the local population in some villages is already Muslim), and ending with the USA and Canada. Taking these figures into consideration, one cannot call the Western European and Northern American countries as truly a ‘Christian Club’.

 

Not a single logical Middle Easterner considers NATO as ‘Crusaders’.

 

Second ‘argument’ of the Chirac anti-NATO and anti-Iraq hysteria is that Nato in Iraq would remind these masses of the Crusaders! Well, this is another argument of Ossama bin Laden that execrable Chirac dares to adopt and further diffuse! But it is just rubbish! Except the extremist and fanaticized masses, no other Middle Easterner would ever consider NATO’s presence in Iraq as the 21st century Crusaders! Except, Chirac wants to diffuse even more this concept among them in order to radicalize them up to the level of forming an anti-American alliance with Ossama bin Laden!

 

Many Iraqis wish a very strong presence of NATO in Iraq.

 

Truly speaking, what happens in Iraq, and what the average Iraqi wishes id diametrically opposed to the paranoiac assumptions of the French diplomacy. There are many in the Middle East, who would love to see ‘Crusaders’ arrive from the West! Of course, here ‘Crusaders’ stands for generals and statesmen, intellectuals and academia, businessmen, and international cooperation based on

a) Human Rights,

Democracy,

c) Respect for Minority Rights,

d) Effort for Progress and Emancipation,

e) Collapse of the Colonial Nightmare and

f) Deletion of the related literature of Falsehood.

 

Limiting the subject within Iraq itself, I intend to focus, underscore and highlight those who want truly to see Western Crusaders arriving in Iraq, contradicting both,

1) the American hesitation to go ahead with a very daring and far-reaching program, and

2) the ferocious French opposition to any effort for human improvement in Iraq.

 

Criminal France hides and censors Iraqi minorities in order to preserve its false myth of an Arabic Iraq inimical to the USA.

 

These minorities wish the arrival of Western Crusaders in present day Iraq:

· the Mandaeans. A religious minority that consists in the only survival of the Gnosticisms of the Late Antiquity. They exclusively live in Iraq, and speak Syriac, the latest form of Aramaic.

· The Yazidis. This is a Kurdish religious minority living in the surroundings of Mosul, and generally speaking in Northern Iraq. Being an interesting subject for the History of Religions, they consist in a unique amalgamation of Gnosticist and Islamic elements. They have their own holy book, Maskhaf-e Ras (the Holy Black Book), and they have been long persecuted by the barbaric and bloody killers of the Wahhabi group as ‘Satano-latrous’.

· The Ahl-e Haq religious minority of the Kurds.

· The Christians of Iraq, either Nestorian or Monophysitic, who consist in a very large minority, and speak Syriac (Aramaic), like the Mandaeans.

· The Turks / Turkomans of Iraq, another sizable minority of Iraq.

· The Armenian, Circassian, and Persian minorities.

· The various Kurdish minorities (the use of Plural is due to the fact that they consist in many groups, speak different languages, etc)

 

One should stress at this point that the aforementioned minorities mount up to 40% of the entire Iraqi population, since there are only two groups unmentioned, namely

a) the Sunnite Arabic-speaking group that does not exceed 10% of the entire population, and had been transformed into a terrorizing tool in the hands of the former dictator, who belonged to and was supported by that group, bestowing all sorts of privileges upon the group members, and

the Shia Arabic-speaking group that consists in the largest of the Iraqi ethnic – religious entities, representing half of the country’s population.

 

There is still a group of Iraqis that may wish to see Western Crusaders arriving in Iraq; these people are

· Shia or Sunni Iraqis, who want to live in a Western style, and reject the idea of installing an old and obsolete religious rule and system in their society.

 

At this moment one should stress the point that under the previous dictator, there was no theocratic system imposed in Iraq, and several aspects of Western daily life habits, free contact between girls and boys, use of alcohol, etc were prevailing – in striking contrast with backward and obscurantist Egypt, or evil Saudi Arabia.

 

The American administration should highlight, regroup and base its policy in Iraq on the aforementioned multi-partite, multi-ethnic, multi-lingual, multi-religious and multi-cultural majority, disarming and ultimately disabling the uneducated and fanaticized Iraqis from damaging the process of nation-building that will certainly take long.

 

If France cares about avoiding the Clash of Civilizations, France must allow Muslim girls wear the Islamic veil in the French schools.

 

The correct answer to the French perverted insistence on keeping NATO far from Iraq is:

- How a country that prohibits Muslim girls to wear hedjab (the Islamic veil) in the schools, displays such an unusual care for what the Islamic extremists and terrorists are going to think for the arrival of NATO in Iraq?

 

Ultimately, the presence of NATO in Iraq is not going to add to the ‘Clash of Civilization’ theory, despite the falsely announced French fear! Quite contrarily, it is going to annul this perspective, by contributing to the establishment of a Western democratic country - second to Turkey in the Middle East - that will precipitate radical changes among its neighbors. And this is certainly what France is mostly afraid of.

 

Soon after the imposition of civil order, Iraq should enter NATO. France could then go; it would not matter, since France and Iraq have approximately the same size; especially if we do not count Corsica for France.

[Φ canugur]

Lütfen, foruma getirdiginiz yabanci dil kaynaklarini, dip not olarak gösterip, Türkce olarak dile getirirseniz, okunurlugun artacagindan emin olunuz.